What is the ambiguity effect?

When making a decision, we prefer options that are certain rather than those that are vague or missing information, because we dislike uncertainty. This cognitive bias is known as the ambiguity effect.

When faced with an ambiguous decision, we often automatically eliminate an option purely because we assume taking a risk is too risky. This cognitive bias prevents us from pursuing the long-term benefits of riskier choices.

An ambiguity effect occurs when decision-makers are given incomplete information about the probability of a certain outcome, resulting in a biased choice. In contrast, risk aversion occurs when decision-makers are given both probabilities and gravitate toward the option with a lower payoff but higher chance of success. Even when we understand both probability values, we might not be able to make good decisions if we have an aversion to risky choices.

Many systems are impacted by the ambiguity effect

Institutions, such as schools, companies, and governments, are affected by ambiguity. Small decisions that we make in our daily lives are also affected by ambiguity. Because institutions, such as schools, companies, and governments, remain committed to failing systems rather than introducing new policies or programs with the potential to improve them, they are more likely to remain committed to failing systems rather than implementing changes. Because we have no guarantees that things will not go wrong and we will not be worse off for it, things will not go wrong and we will be more certain of the course of action. Institutions can lose out if they choose not to take a risk, as well as the people they are supposed to benefit.

There are several explanations for why the ambiguity effect takes place. One theory is that this cognitive bias is a rule of thumb that enables quick, effortless decision-making and problem-solving. A more common behavior, ambiguity aversion, may cause people to exhibit this cognitive bias.

The ambiguity effect is said to be caused by a heuristic used to simplify decision-making. It can be thought of as a general solution approach that operates automatically and effortlessly. It can help you come to a decision quickly. Heuristics have survived for so long because they are frequently accurate. If we employ them, we may draw a conclusion that is inaccurate or poorly informed, since we do not use logic and critical thinking.

The ambiguity effect is an adaptive response to a certain degree. People prefer options that they feel well-informed about to options that they feel leave too much to the imagination because it is an adaptive response. Even better, the ambiguity effect may lead us to seek out more information about the ambiguous option so that we can make a more informed choice.

There are some situations where this rule is effective. This heuristic is not ideal in any situation, as described by Frisch and Baron. The ambiguity effect is a framing effect that draws attention to, or away from, certain unknown aspects of an option, making it appear ambiguous or unambiguous. When making decisions, one may believe that they know everything about an alternative simply because they lack imagination about what they might have discovered. This heuristic, therefore, makes decision-making easier, but it is not as practical or as reliable as it should be. Furthermore, it should not be used in any situation where the consequences are significant.

There are two choices before you. The probability for the first option to result in a certain favorable outcome is known, whereas the probability for the second option to do so is unknown. This is known as ambiguity aversion. The ambiguity effect is driven by this aversion to uncertainty.

It is crucial to distinguish between ambiguity aversion and risk aversion because they are similar but distinct behaviors. When the probabilities of different options resulting in certain outcomes are known, risk aversion occurs. Those who are more risk averse will choose an option with a lower payoff because it has a higher probability of success than an option with a higher payoff, in these situations. 3 In these cases, ambiguity aversion is the desire to eliminate or reduce the amount of uncertainty in a decision.

Some people have a higher level of ambiguity aversion than others. Unfortunately, we cannot fully explain why the ambiguity effect occurs, since we do not understand why some people exhibit more ambiguity aversion than others.

Avoiding the ambiguity effect

Understanding what the ambiguity effect is and how it affects our decision-making is important because it is one of the cognitive biases where decision-making is compromised. From there, we can work towards recognizing when we are being affected by it. By avoiding this bias altogether, we will be able to make well-informed decisions based on reason.

The first step in avoiding being limited by our initial impulse to avoid ambiguous choices and situations is to recognize its existence and impact on our decision-making.

Heuristics make decisions effortless and automatic. Choosing how to allocate our mental resources can be an efficient approach to making decisions in the face of so much information and choice. It may be beneficial to rethink the situation in order to see that the less ambiguous alternative isn't as good as you think. What you may not know is that the less ambiguous option may be the better choice. Furthermore, when assessing the less straightforward alternative, it's critical to contemplate the positive results that are just as likely to occur. When faced with uncertainty, we typically assume the worst possibility, forgetting that there is as much likelihood of the best outcome.

Where it came from

In 1961, Daniel Ellsberg first described the concept of the ambiguity effect. This paper provided the foundation for the theory of this cognitive bias, although it did not use the term “ambiguity effect.”

This paper describes one of the most common examples of the ambiguity effect and how it is explained.

Imagine that you are participating in a carnival game that offers $100 for drawing a ball of a particular color from a bucket containing 90 balls, 30 of which are red. You must choose between drawing a yellow ball or a red one. You will win $100 if you draw a yellow ball, but drawing a black ball or a ball of a color different from the one you bet on will yield you nothing.

There are 30 red balls out of the 90 balls in the bag, so the probability of drawing a red ball is ⅓. So, why do most people prefer to bet on a red ball? It's because the chance of drawing a yellow ball is equally distributed between zero and 60, so the probability of drawing a yellow ball is also ⅓. Because people prefer the known to the unknown, there is no statistical reason for their choice.

‍

In summary

When we have little information about an option, we tend to avoid it. This is known as the ambiguity effect in decision-making.

People with higher levels of ambiguity aversion are more likely to exhibit this behavior as a result of a heuristic to avoid options for which we don’t have enough information.

To avoid the ambiguity effect, we must approach decision-making actively and effortfully. Instead of automatically choosing the less ambiguous option, we should identify what we don’t know about that option as well as recognize the advantages of choosing the more ambiguous option.